Chalkhills Digest, Volume 11, Number 42 Tuesday, 9 August 2005 Topics: Re: Pop Politics The Return of the Sorely Missed Chocolate Brown Ass-Pants Naming Names ...must...resist... meet the new boss Surface Songwriting and 'These People' POP GO THE KAB! Administrivia: To UNSUBSCRIBE from the Chalkhills mailing list, send a message to <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> with the following command: unsubscribe For all other administrative issues, send a message to: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> Please remember to send your Chalkhills postings to: <chalkhills@chalkhills.org> World Wide Web: <http://chalkhills.org/> The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors. Chalkhills is compiled with Digest 3.8c (John Relph <relph@tmbg.org>). Wash your feet / And with spotless dharma come complete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 00:33:56 -0400 From: "Jason Damas" <jason.damas@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Pop Politics Message-ID: <010b01c59a40$0fa42fd0$0302a8c0@JASON> << I won't go on (as much I'd like to). XTC did politics in their art and they did it well... they just tip toed from specifying names and places.>> And this is why I think their politically-themed songs are so well done. Too much specificity makes the songs sound dated---just think of how we'll regard, say, the last Beastie Boys album, laden with explicit anti-Bush speech, in 20 years? Being about specific events but not "naming names" as it were means that the songwriters are forced to use more clever wordplay and reach for bigger themes that may (sadly) become relevent again. I agree with all those who said that XTC's politicized lyrics are quite good. --J
------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 06:59:58 -0700 From: Wesley Hanks <whanks1@earthlink.net> Subject: The Return of the Sorely Missed Chocolate Brown Ass-Pants Message-ID: <0B17CE94-7F6E-4774-BE45-19EDF0090141@earthlink.net> Barrel-Bobbers, Satellite tv raconteurs Direct TV is now carrying the Logo Channel (Channel 263). The channel has just begun airing "Wonderfalls", an excellently written, acted and directed show that was never given a chance by the stunningly idiotic programming executives at Fox. I think they broke the land speed record for how fast they cancelled it. Oh, and a certain pub-rocker performs the opening theme song. Wes Las Vegas
------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 16:54:15 +0200 From: "don device" <device@noos.fr> Subject: Naming Names Message-ID: <001201c59a96$b723dd40$a43e4251@computer> Hiya, Whilst I agree that most political music (by this I mean PROTEST music, mostly, I guess) dates badly, this tends to be from being too specific. I find XTC to be quitye a political band, although I'm not sure I'd consider 'Melt the Guns' so political, lumping rather uneasily into the 'All You Need is Love' school of politics, ie 'Don't kill people', 'Love Each other', 'Open Your Eyes', etc... They DO name names however; 'Gaddaffy Duck propelled from Jimmy Swaggart's tommy gun.... but it seems mostly abstract to me, and so much the better... One of the only 'Political' singers not to have been dated adn destroyed shiva-style by the changing times was Mr Bob Dylan, precisely because he kept the images and ideas on an abstract level 'A Change is Gonna Come', etc... You always got the idea you knew what he was singing about, but in the end... Blowing, or rather turning slowly in the wind, d-squared
------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:31:11 -0700 From: "Pastula Aaron" <pastula12@hotmail.com> Subject: ...must...resist... Message-ID: <BAY24-F1FE76A292203DC9F20D91A2C60@phx.gbl> Simon said: >I can respect another's beliefs and admire their convictions upon the >condition that they don't see their beliefs as having any more validity >than my own... Well, why on earth do we have opinions and preferences, if not because we think there is a better, more preferable way of thinking or doing things? At its core, this statemement makes no sense -- you will only respect my opinions on condition that I admit that my outlook on the world really is no better than yours; therefore, my opinions and convictions are automatically inferior to yours, in your eyes, because you will simply discount them unless I admit that they really have no intristic value that makes them more preferable to *your* worldview (and I would never do that, because if I did, then what would be the point of choosing them as my beliefs and convictions?). What you're advocating is basically like Lance Armstrong saying he'll only enter the Tour de France if everyone agrees not to pull ahead of him. >Can anyone name a song they love >but violently disagree with the lyrics? "Mayor of Simpleton." I mean, who does that guy think he is, anyway?? What a loser. :) Seriously, I answered that question when my XTC tribute band did a *kick-ass* version of "Melt the Guns" that was passionately sung (and has always been loved) by yours truly, a card-carrying member of the NRA and someone who thinks Andy has it all wrong when it comes to gun culture in the USA. Top o' the morning, Aaron.
------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:52:20 -1000 From: Jim Smart <jimsmart1@mac.com> Subject: meet the new boss Message-ID: <59310.1123411940746.JavaMail.jimsmart1@mac.com> Simon asks about liking songs we differ with politically. I'm not aware of much right wing music, so it's hard to say. I've heard "Proud to be an American" (who hasn't?), and I know that an awful lot of folks like Toby Keith. Can't stand Nugent, ... hmmm what else is there? I love the way Green Day's "American Idiot" is the perfect use of punk pop anger. Something to shout about! Something to be angry about! I love it, but so does my right winger friend. So maybe he's your example of someone liking something he doesn't agree with. Jim
------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:51:55 +1000 From: "Simon Knight" <homefrontradio@hotmail.com> Subject: Surface Songwriting and 'These People' Message-ID: <BAY18-F153EFE927D04074C87A96FD0B90@phx.gbl> With knuckles up, I posted: >What exactly are these people surmising from 'Dear God', 'Books are >Burning', 'Beating Of Hearts', 'This World Over', 'Here Comes President >Kill Again' and 'Melt The Guns', to name but a few examples? To which Aaron replied: >It's statements like this that make me chuckle when people say that *I'm* >the one who's close-minded... And he followed with a succinct statement as to how he interprets Andy's work against his own political framework. This is a good thing, for I simply could not understand how one could listen to XTC and yet make an inflammatory statement regarding `Superior Firepower', especially in our current climate, and when I know people's who's lives have been destroyed by war. I personally apologise, Aaron, and thank you for point of view, but I strongly disagree. In that spirit, I offer my point-of-view, and then will shut up on the subject. We must hear music very differently, for songwriter's *can* touch all the areas you describe, at least *to me*. They can comment on society and document history, they can teach us about matters political, they can be diplomatic and wax philosophical. As trite as I personally find the lyrics to `Imagine' by John Lennon, a large majority of the population seems to find something of value in the sentiment of that song. Listen to some folk fields recordings during the great depression and tell me that the singers aren't singing some inherent truth about their lives. Try some 60's folk and hear how people are still yearning for change and action against injustice. Can they cause change? Witness the rise of causes like Greenpeace, Live Aid and Amnesty International in the 80's. Andy is a great songwriter, and has been all the things you listed in song. He makes clear his political viewpoints, (`Melt The Guns', `Human Alchemy', `Books Are Burning'), he sings of different religious practices, (`Dear God', `Church Of Women', `Easter Theatre', `Green Man'), is the diplomat in both the literal sense, (`Knuckle Down'), and in his choice of lyrics of accepting responsibility, (`The Wheel And The Maypole'), or by couching his personal problems in metaphor, (`Dear Madam Barnum'). As a historian, he documents both time, (`This World Over'), and place (`The Everyday Story of Smalltown'). I can't stress enough how much I became aware of history as a teenager simply by listening to XTC and wondering what a `Never-Never Navvy' was, or looking up `Miracle Play', `Edward Lear', or `Fox Talbot'. The delight of recognising `Always Winter, Never Christmas' as being a CS Lewis reference, or the discovery of Bosch through `The Garden Of Earthly Delights'. Now I'm not saying I learnt everything I needed to know from just one song. He wasn't just throwing his lyrics out there to be taken at face value. I acted and reacted to the information he fed me, and would investigate what I was hearing. This is what great songwriters do- they give more than just the song: they convey information and let you discover more about the world than you knew previously. (Not counting the musical links they forged). For example: REM led me to `Walden' and William Faulkner 10,000 Maniacs led me to Jack Kerouac, The Great Depression and Western History David Bowie led me to William Burroughs and Christopher Isherwood Kate Bush led me to Wilhelm Reich, Harry Houdini and Emily Bronte Talking Heads led me everywhere! Whilst I was taking this all in, my music classmates were listening to Bon Jovi's `You Give Love A Bad Name' and Poison, and sneered at me for bringing copies of `Stop Making Sense' and `The Dreaming' into class - ("What is this poofta music?"). I'm a better educated person, and have a wider worldview simply by listening to great songs by great artists. Songs that made me *think*, put forth by people who had carefully considered their lyrics and, most importantly, *believed* in what they were singing. If songs were simple musings, why would they bother putting them out there, unless they really had nothing to say. It still happens. I'd never heard the phrase `Axis Mundi', (theology again!), until the last XTC record. Thank you, Andy for making me continually curious about the world. As to the `These People' comment: I used the phrase `these people' knowing full well the inflammatory nature of what I was saying, and the blind generalizations it suggests. I was intentionally lumping you in with Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter et al, under the banner of right wing extremity, seeing you as one faceless group, with the actions of a few within that group speaking for all of you. Dehumanising, isn't it? Now imagine you're in a group that's marginalized within society and regularly has that phrase used against you by uninformed speakers like Ingraham preaching messages of hate, looking for anywhere to lay the blame but at their own feet, for throughout history it's Always Someone Else's Fault. You look at yourself and wonder why they're saying these things about you when they bear no relation to the realities of your everyday life. If you're in a position of power and privilege within society, it might be hard, even impossible, to understand, and easier to be glib. (As Laura Ingraham says American = white, southern, Christian, and Republican, though she pointedly left wealthy off the list). But say you're poor and uneducated, like my grandfather, or marry outside your class and religion, like my grandmother, or have the good sense to leave an abusive husband but are labelled a divorcee, like my mother, or happen to be born gay, like me? How can the sum of our life experience be boiled down to one category? Most of us are powerless. The simple act of creating Songs, Novels, and Art can be our Voice, since we don't want to resort to guns, bombs and violence to get our point across to those put in a position of power over our lives by basically having what amounts to as familial, financial, educational and class advantage over us, (for America has a class system however much it tries to deny it). Otherwise we are lumped into categories of blame for Why Things Aren't Better, and told exactly how we're living our lives wrong, and legislated against. (I hope you're lucky or privileged enough to never have experienced discrimination and can't relate). Knuckles Down, Simon p.s. It's ironic that the original post that accussed the Chalkhills list of being inflammatory actually *sparked* this political debate, otherwise I'm sure no-one would have commented further.
------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:38:05 +0100 From: stevesomerset <stevesomerset@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: POP GO THE KAB! Message-ID: <BF1CE68D.15DF%stevesomerset@blueyonder.co.uk> NEW SHADOW KABINET TRACK EXCLUSIVE ON ALAN HABER'S PURE POP SHOW! Over the past few weeks I have been busy here in Camden recording new Shadow Kabinet tracks. Although the next album is not due for a while you can hear a brand new song on Saturday13th August. It's called 'The Strings Of Her Sitar' and you can catch it on Alan Haber's Pure Pop Show on WEBR. The show goes out at 1pm Virginia time and 5pm in the UK. The rest of you will have to work out your time zones. The track is a jangly guitar fest for summer complete with Mellotron flutes. To listen go to... http://www.fcac.org/webr/ Plus I'm very excited to have been asked to be a guest presenter on Alan's internet version of the Pure Pop Show on 365 live.com. I'll be recording a hour special soon and spinning some of my favourite tunes as the first of Alan's guest DJ's. I'll let you know when it's going out. Here's the link to all things Pure Pop... http://www.purepopradio.com And here the link to Alan Haber's Pure Pop on Live365.com: http://www.live365.com/stations/zoogang?play All the best Steve Somerset The Shadow Kabinet
------------------------------ End of Chalkhills Digest #11-42 *******************************
Go back to Volume 11.
10 August 2005 / Feedback