Precedence: bulk
Subject: Chalkhills Digest #6-15

          Chalkhills Digest, Volume 6, Number 15

                 Monday, 24 January 2000

Today's Topics:

                xtc & the beatles (again)
                         Date Due
                those Drunken Jam Sessions
                       an epiphany
                     Uffington Horse
                     FUNK POP A BOWL
                     Adrian Partridge
 AV2 cover there really any reason to speculate?
               Apple Venus 2 demo synopsis
                    Andy IS on the web
                       High Llamas
                    Dunk In Doh! Knot


    To UNSUBSCRIBE from the Chalkhills mailing list, send a message to
    <> with the following command:


    For all other administrative issues, send a message to:


    Please remember to send your Chalkhills postings to:


    World Wide Web: <>

    The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors.

    Chalkhills is compiled with Digest 3.7 (John Relph <>).

Now you forced to walk.


Message-Id: <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:24:32 -0500
From: David Oh <>
Subject: xtc & the beatles (again)

i'm sorry if this may seem a little redundant, but i've heard, and read,
this so many times, i thought i would put to the members of the 'hill for

what i've heard and read is that "skylarking" is regarded as xtc's "sgt.

my question is this: do you agree or do you think this is a load of
cobblers, as one dom lawson would so eloquently put it? i am a little
curious as to what the general concensus is regarding this viewpoint.

i have my own spin on this argument, but i'll save that for later...


From: "Mark Strijbos" <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:33:20 +0100
Subject: Listless
Message-Id: <>

Dear Chalkers,

First of all: "mass taste" seems a contradiction in terms to me

Our mutual friend Tyler Hewitt said:

> Some songs ARE better than others.
oo-oh! dangerous ground ahead

> Most are obvious-Hey Jude is better than Disco Duck.
welllllll... nes and yo. I have very fond memories of Disco Duck

> Why we need a list to tell us that Respect
> is better than Sittin on the Dock of the Bay is beyond
> me. Prove it!

indeed, we need proof!
It's no good just saying that Hey Jude is better, you have to explain
to us _why_
What makes this forum so interesting is discourse and debate, not
statements and slogans. Or stupid lists...

yours in xtc,

Mark Strijbos at The Little Lighthouse


From: "Mark Strijbos" <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:33:20 +0100
Subject: Date Due
Message-Id: <>

Dear Chalkers,

Somebody asked if this was right:

> This item [AV2] will be released on 3 April, 2000.

The latest catalog from Badlands (a UK specialist record store)
mentions a release date of April 30th but that's a Sunday.

On the other hand i suspect that April 3 might be a bit optimistic.
Albums in general, and XTC albums in particular, are usually late.
Don't hold your breath

PS: does anyone have a tape yet? email me privately please

yours in xtc,

Mark Strijbos at The Little Lighthouse


From: "Mark Strijbos" <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:33:20 +0100
Subject: Shssss!
Message-Id: <>

Dear Chalkers,

Last issue, my former friend and confidante Debie spilled the beans:

> Just think, you could have a room with a "shed" view from your back
> bedroom windows!
i thought we had agreed we would keep this a secret until I had
managed to get that job at Tesco's, so _I_ could move in there.

> Now I know Mark Strijbos was thinking about possibly moving to Swindon
> one day,
I solemnly swear that one day, when i'm old and gray, i will come
and live in the beautiful Wiltshire countryside. Perhaps i'll even
start that little XTC museum that should have been there already!

> but I reckon this might just get him packing
Only if you'd move in there with me, sweetie...  I'll bring my synths,
you can play your guitar and together we'll annoy The Neighbour
until He bangs His head against our wall.

yours in xtc,

Mark Strijbos at The Little Lighthouse


Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:35:28 -0800
Message-Id: <>
From: "Sir Demon Brown" <>
Subject: those Drunken Jam Sessions


   Out of the goodness of my heart, I've put
   up a page where XTC zealots can grab hold
   of those lengendary "Drunken Jam Sessions."
   Ya know... supposedly during the Black Sea
   sessions they got a little tipsy and started
   doing some major wanking. Well.. here it is!
   All free. High quality 160 bit, 44.1 khz MP3's.

   Sir Demon Brown


Message-Id: <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:35:05 -0500
From: David Oh <>
Subject: an epiphany

i just had an epiphany whist in the shower - i hate when that happens, but
at least i can clean up afterwards... oh, nevermind!

i'm surprised that no one has done a parody song (weird al?) to that bloody
awful "mambo #5 (a little bit of...)" song.

i can hear, in a bill clinton voice, the song going something like this:

"a little bit of monica on her knees/a little bit of monica, please,
please, please"

etc, etc, and including the names of all the women slick-willie has
"allegedly" been with. of course, it wouldn't include hillary...

ok, sorry for the off-topic post & i'll shut up now...

 peace & xtc,



Message-Id: <v04220800b4adfdba42b0@[]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:18:11 -0500
From: "Christopher R. Coolidge" <>
Subject: Uffington Horse

At 8:00 AM -0800 1/20/00, Debie <> wrote:
>Have any of you ever thought about moving here to Swindon?  Nah, I thought
>not - nothing much to tempt you here I guess, except for the odd sighting!!
>Well, maybe this will do it?  The house one door away from Andy's has just
>come up for sale!  It is a very nice Victorian end-terrace house in a
>tree-lined road in Old Town, Swindon.  (Yes, Andy officially lives down a
>"road" rather than a street or avenue).  Just think, you could have a room
>with a "shed" view from your back bedroom windows!

   Speaking of Swindon, a video on ancient pagan symbols was being
shown in the comparative religion class I'm taking, and I couldn't
help noticing an aerial shot of the famous Uffington Horse. Cool.
Apparently its function was something similar to Stonehenge, which I
hadn't realised. As a local, could you perhaps fill me in on its
significance?(the Uffington Horse, BTW, for those who didn't know, is
the symbol on the cover of English Settlement; it's etched in a
hillside near Swindon)

Christopher R. Coolidge

Homepage at

"A Great law protects me from the government. The Bill of rights has
10 GREAT laws.  A Good law protects me from you.  Laws against murder,
theft, assault and the like are good laws.  A Poor law attempts to
protect me from myself."  - Unknown


Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:50:30 EST

Patrick M Adamek scribbled:

In Chalkhills #6-12 Wes Long wrote:

I hate the Stones but can't really argue with "Satisfaction" being #1
ya gotta pick something #1.

My question: do you really? I have always found it peculiar that
we Americans need to rank everything all of the time

Well Pat, I agree with you.  BUT, IF you be making a list o the top 100
songs, THEN you have to pick something as the # 1.  I'm not condoning the
list.  By the way, you're not a REAL American, you live in Alaska!(smiley

Hey, I actually know someone that lives in Juneau.  She's a former GA girl.

Folks, if you're lookin' for rare XTC audio then look no further,

wesLONG @ Optimism's Flames:

Thank you, and goodnight.


From: "Gary Thompson" <>
Subject: tvgohome
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:24:12 -0000
Message-ID: <000601bf64d3$9707a180$1814a8c2@garythom>

Thank you to whoever posted the address of this site. It is by far the
funniest thing I have seen since The League Of Gentlemen appeared on
(British)TV. Heartily recommended!

'We won't be told the past was pure gold
We were there and it wasn't'
Paddy McAloon


Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:52:32 EST
Subject: Adrian Partridge

Fellow Chalkgeeks:

Ran across this on a Belew site:

The Internet Forum for Adrian Belew Fans
Edition #34

Tuesday, June 10, 1997

Hello again Tribe!

For all you XTC/Belew fans, there is great news to report.
On Tuesday, June 3rd, Mitch Friedman (a friend of Andy
Partridge) sent me an Email for Adrian which I forwarded.
Long story short... Adrian contacted Mitch, now has Andy
Partridge's phone number and according to the story, has
contacted Andy.  So the possibility of a Belew/Partridge
collaboration is one step closer.

Probably old news to you all.....not to me,



Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:58:31 -0900
From: Patrick M Adamek <>
Subject: AV2 cover there really any reason to speculate?


     I have noticed increased discussions of what should appear on the
cover of the new XTC album, Apple Venus Vol. 2.  I do not understand
this speculation because I took the cover art displayed in Chalkhills to
be the definitive one.  Viewable in Chalkhills for a number of months, I
now wonder if indeed it is the plan for the new cover art or not.  It
can be viewed at:

    I have ordered my Chalkhills T-shirts and I encourage everyone to do
so.  What better way to advertise our favorite band/web site?!

    Re: Star Park (the album which I commented on in a recent post), I
have listened to it now several more times.  I am more comfortable with
it and I have a full appreciation for the fact that it is actually
"pre-XTC."  When I had the full picture of an early 70s Andy writing
songs as he appeared on page 148 of "Song Stories" being heavily
influenced by the Stooges and The New York Dolls, it was easier for me
to digest these tracks.


    Patrick Adamek
    Juneau, Alaska

	[ If you hold your mouse over the "cover art", it says NOT
	  THE ACTUAL ALBUM ART.  Just something I threw together,
	  sorry. -- John ]


Message-ID: <>
Date: 22 Jan 00 19:34:20 PST
From: Brian Wysolmierski <>
Subject: Apple Venus 2 demo synopsis

To the person who wants to know what the Apple Venus 2 demos sound like,

OK, here's my quick synopsis. I heard these from the now defunt XTC Live &

  BOARDED UP: Colin in "bummed out" mode. Im neutral to this song right
now.  I'll have to hear the finished product.  I couldnt make out the
lyrics in the fuzzy version I heard, so I'm sure they make the song much
cooler.  Lyrics in Colins' "bummed out" songs always rule.
  CHURCH OF WOMEN: Bouncy bass line and a catchy chorus that could go on
forever. I'm not sure if I like how Andy sings on the bridge, but I'm sure
it'll sound better in the real version. Excellent song.
  STANDING IN FOR JOE: Colin sounding suspiciously like Davey Jones.
  IM THE MAN WHO MURDERED LOVE: It's got a very "Dear Madam Barnum" feel to
it. Sweet sounding song with harsh lyrics.  Good stuff.
  SOME LOVELY (MY BROWN GUITAR): A slow, sugary sweet ode to masturbating
(that's how I interpret it anyways). It's got a multitude of overlapping
vocal harmonies.  McCartney-esque.
  YOU & THE CLOUDS WILL STILL BE BEAUTIFUL: It's the only demo I didn't care
for, no matter how good the lyrics are.  It sounds like Stevie Wonder
singing a Paul Simon song to me.
  PLAYGROUND: Oh, this song is awesome. It's got a rockin' riff, catchy as
hell chorus.

...Well, that's my opinion. Hope it helps.-Brian


Message-ID: <>
Date: 23 Jan 00 19:38:21 PST
From: Brian Wysolmierski <>
Subject: Andy IS on the web

The fact that Andy contributes to the webpage proves that he is
And I bet he checks out the Chalkhills page too.
It would suck if he read my comment about You & the Clouds Will Still Be
Beautiful (I said it sounded like Stevie Wonder singing a Paul Simon song).


Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:22:59 +0100
From: Volker Dieling <>
Organization: Universitaet Oldenburg
Subject: High Llamas

Hi all !

In #6-14, Maggie asked about the High Llamas.
I love them. Anyone here who likes Brian Wilson and AV1 should go and
listen. Their latest, "Snowbug" is a masterpiece, as are "Hawaii",
"Gideon Gaye" and "Cold and Bouncy". Then you'll love them and while
you're there, just go and buy every Stereolab album you can get (they're
friends of the Llamas), and then buy Ui, as they've collaborated with
Stereolab (btw, so have Blur) on the Uilab E.P., and then suddenly I'll
find XTC doing a splitsingle with Tortoise, and I'm ready to die.
Anyone who likes a massive guitar and some Travels in Nihilon / Voivod
atmosphere, like you, Dom, should check out Atombombpocketknife on
Southern Records. Their selftitled EP is now living in my CD player,
barking at anyone trying to replace it. I guess I'll ony be able to tame
it with AV2....
And by the way, maybe I said this before, but all of you having Go+ on
vinyl go play it at 33.3 rpm.

Cheers all. Lemon

Lemoncurry residing in the Lemon Lounge at
Send your spam to
Save the Mudokons !


Message-ID: <>
From: Lawson Dominic <>
Subject: Dunk In Doh! Knot
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:31:39 -0000

Lovely Dave said...

>>"Mass taste" a way yes: they are the media's taste in the same way
that popular acts of the past were.  Sometimes the media's taste and wider
fashion tastes coincide.  Not at the moment.

Spoken like a gentleman. Yep, you're totally right...there are times when
the two things coincide, and I suppose The Beatles are the classic example
of this. I think the main difference is that currently the media seem more
prescriptive than reactive, but the public tends to get what it deserves a
lot of the time so there's little point in getting irate about it. Which, of
course, I wasn't.

>>A small minority of the British public bought punk records,  but the punk
phenomenon changed what you saw on the high streets of Britain. I don't see
any of the boy/girl bands changing anything.  They have neither talent nor
the interest of anyone over 15.

Ooh you ageist bastard! Ahem. Anyway, yes, you're spot on I
said before, these things are clearly not aimed at the likes of us, and I
tend to view it with amusement rather than seething resentment, but it is
slightly annoying that record companies would rather make stars of grinning
stage-school monkeys than genuinely talented musicians and writers. I
suppose boy/girl bands must demand fairly low financial maintenance compared
to all-drinkin', all-smokin' rock bands and, of course, they're also very
easy to replace with whoever's next on the conveyor belt. In fairness, these
kids should really be making a living doing musicals or working as
children's TV presenters - jobs for which they are much better equipped -
but if the target audience continue to lap this nonsense up then who are we
to argue?

>>Being a "mass" interest does not necessitate the involvement of the

No, I understand what you mean and I will concede that in that context you
are right. I think maybe we have a different understanding of what "mass
taste" means, although clearly we're not miles apart on the subject. I was
taking "mass" to imply a majority, and so my post doesn't really stand up to
scrutiny from your perspective. Bah, foiled again.

>>So, I would argue that there is a connection between the charts and wider
mass taste, and that at the moment it is a weaker one than at many moments
in the past (by no means all!).

You rational sod. I couldn't have, and didn't, put it better myself. There
is definitely a connection, for sure, but I just feel that the low record
sales needed to have a "hit" in the UK these days do tend to make a mockery
of the idea that the charts signify anything other than the fact that record
companies are successfully emptying the pockets of their (not particularly
huge) chosen target audience. Easy money, I believe, is the phrase.

>>With due respect, you're missing one of my points, or at least dancing
around it.

Well, I'm a lovely mover after a couple of shandies.

>>What is a weak genre to start with
is getting weaker due to repetition and lack of originality.

Indeed, but then I don't think I said anything different. Initially this was
not quite the case - Take That released largely original (in one sense at
least!) material, and were, at times, strangely compelling in their own
bland way. The stream of increasingly weak versions of the formula which
have stumbled our way in recent years are certainly devoid of any real
musical value, although I should say that I would gladly stand up for
people's right to listen to such things (just in case I get accused of being
an elitist again....I mean, come on!), and I don't think the phenomenon does
a lot to encourage kids to look beyond the charts for their musical
entertainment (although personally I couldn't think of a better advert for
non-chart music than the truly dismal Westlife who have actually managed to
make Boyzone look like they have at least one personality between them).

>> If you believe, as I argued above, that the charts have been
important, then the boy band/girl band genre could be viewed as a cancerous
growth that is killing them off.

Yeah, to a certain extent but I think that's a slight over-reaction. The
charts are certainly less important than they were ten or twenty years ago,
and the last couple of years in particular have been depressing at times,
but I just don't accept that this is damaging to the music scene (as opposed
to music industry)'s a mildly diverting (and disconcerting)
sideshow, but if you look at how popular Macy Gray or Travis are at the
moment, there is evidently still a big audience for well-written songs and
talented players, albeit an audience which has a noticeably higher average
age than the poor sods who buy Scooch records. I suspect that when the next
bandwagon rolls into town - and it could be driven by a Jarvis Cocker, a
Kurt Nobrain, an Andy Weatherall or even, Ozzy forbid, a Max Cavalera - the
media will find the change far more inspiring than the current situation,
much as Britpop seemed like much more fun than all that carbon-copied grunge
which appeared post-"Nevermind".

>>To me, the smell of
stagnation is overwhelming.

Yeah, sorry about that. I really must change these socks.

>>As for club/dance music...that would require a different set of arguments
that I can't be bothered to make right now.  Suffice to say that that is
also formulaic, repetitive and uninspiring outside of a night club.

Hmmmm.....that sounds a bit too much like Dunks' piss-weak remark about
Metal. I love a good sweeping generalisation myself - "all brooms are great"
being a particular favourite - but "club/dance music" is not the
one-dimensional musical sphere that it sometimes appears to outsiders
(myself, at times, included). There's plenty of musically exciting stuff
emanating from that scene, but again, it's rarely served up on a plate for
the uninitiated.

>>The argument about singles being a waste of space is superflous.  Yes
they are, and they always have been.  That's a constant.  Quality of music
in the charts isn't.

Furry muff. I still don't agree that the charts used to be better, at least
not in general terms, but it does seem that the current wave of muppetry is
more starkly at odds with both my and your taste than, say, grunge or
Britpop. This, I suspect, exacerbates your tendency to disapprove and I'm
inclined to agree with the majority of your criticisms.
The argument about singles being a waste of space is not one I was
particularly bothering with - and since I bought one this morning I should
really shut the fuck up - but it's a fact that less people buy them these
days, and that the average single-buyer is far younger than previously,
which was sort of my (not terribly well made) point.

Personally I think I do rather well considering that my posts are written at
gunpoint in a freezing cold dungeon, against the clock and with a very itchy
blindfold strapped to my delightful face. Go on, spare a thought for a poor


As someone wise and overpaid once said, Dunks seems to be arguing with a
big, scary, cartoon version of me and doesn't seem to want to acknowledge
that I might have a sense of humour. I know it's rare for me to make jokes,
but I'm sure I wasn't being that cryptic.

>> It has been ever thus,
pretty much since Frank Sinatra began rocking the bobby-soxers, methinks?
Problem being .... what, exactly?

None as far as I can see. Point being....what, exactly?

>>Why, for instance, is the professional misery-mongering of groups
like Live and Korn deemed worthy of airplay, when XTC are to my ears,
exceptionally more radio friendly? Answer? It's about marketing fads and
fashion, not promoting "good taste"

Try living over here for a couple of weeks and then ask that question again,
to a soundtrack of uproarious laughter from me. Live and Korn on the
radio???? HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Besides, in Korn's case their popularity stems from massive underground
support prior to their eventual signing to a major label, so they would have
sold shitloads of records regardless of marketing fads and fashion.

>>Hmmmm ... pretty bloody large minority, old chap.

Yes, but one million (for instance) is only one sixtieth of our population,
and only two singles sold anywhere near a million copies last year. It's not
a difficult point to grasp is it? You can tit about with semantics as much
as you like, but you either know what I mean and have wilfully
mis-interpreted my point or you're a bit fick, innit.

>>OK they may not sell to people my
age, but is it any less valid because of that?

Valid how? Artistically? If the records were any good then no, they wouldn't
be any less valid as a result of the age of people who buy them, but they're
not. They're shit. Therefore, they are less valid. I'm not saying that the
tastes and opinions of teenagers are less valid, but that the artistic value
of the records is virtually non-existent. Again, you're deliberately missing
the point to score rather desperate points.

>>Why get so wound up about it?

Don't be so silly. If I was wound up about it, I wouldn't have made numerous
references to the fact that it doesn't matter. Are you listening at the

>>And I think attacking
"shrieking mid-pubescents" is kind of silly, and I have to say, smacks of
both  ageism and sexism.

...and that remark smacks of pomposity, humourlessness and a desire to be
perceived as old and wise. Honestly, credit me with some intelligence.
Furthermore, which part of the phrase "shrieking mid-pubescents" is gender
specific? You're seeing demons where none exist I'm afraid. Besides which,
fans of Boyzone (for example) ARE generally mid-pubescent and they have a
tendency to shriek. That's not ageist or sexist, it's a statement of fact. I
don't recall saying that we should conduct a vast cull of teenage girls
because they like crap pop records. Mind you, I quite like the idea in
theory, as long as I can store them in my dungeon.

>>But many of them grow from this intial interest in one band to
develop wide-ranging tastes in music and culture at large.

And many don't. So? I fail to see how anything I said disagreed with this.

>>Nor - thankfully - did they discourage the rampant beast of girl-bandery
the early-mid 1960s (Martha & The Vandellas, The Supremes, The Ronettes) -
music every bit as "manufactured" as today's boy-band pop.

True. Utterly formulaic they were too, as you say, but they had talent.
Therein lies the difference. Diana Ross could (can?) sing, Westlife don't
have a half-decent voice between them.

>>I don't much care
for Britney Spears, but I have to admit that her first single was a great
piece of pop music and a pretty damn good production too.

Best selling single of the year mate, and the great British public couldn't
possibly be wrong could they?

>>Hmmm - bit of a logical flip-flop there matey. Are you anywhere near
Westminster, perchance?


>>I question your egregious generalisation about the
expectations of "most kids", though I do think that "the majority" probably
do listen to a pretty limited range of music, as you alluded to earlier.

Thanks, that saved me from responding to the first half of the sentence.

can't blame people for taking what the system offers.

Why not? My childhood was no different to most, I wasn't party to any inside
information on the music scene and had no relatives or friends introducing
me to new music, but music meant enough to me that I was prepared to get off
my arse and hunt stuff down, explore different genres and take a few risks.
This is not something that requires masses of effort or bags of cash, just a
genuine love for music.

>>With all due respect, I think your whole argument is a bit elitist, Dom. I
don't see what's wrong with letting kids have some fun and get involved in
the pop scene of the period they're growing up in.

Nor do I! What a peculiar interpretation of seemingly straightforward views.
I have absolutely no objections whatsoever, I just think it's a bit
unfortunate that the current UK pop scene is so bereft of ideas.

>>It doesn't have to be
rocket science for Ozzy's sake - it's just ENTERTAINMENT.

Yes, obviously. And mentioning Ozzy doesn't do you any favours, trust me. I
can be adequately patronized at home, thank you very much, so I don't need
it from you.

>>I might (and in fact do) think that a lot
of what might loosely be termed "metal" music is dull, formulaic, riddled
with cliches, emotionally stunted and profoundly silly. I imagine that your
once the expletives had died down, your next response to such a statement
would probably be to say "Oh, you don't understand the genre ... that's only
the mainstream acts ... you need to listen to Such-and-such ... "

No, I wouldn't say anything because it's like talking to a particularly
verbose brick wall.
Of course, since I keep abreast of such things I have a fully formed and
perfectly adequate understanding and appreciation of the current pop charts,
boy bands and even Cliff "Look! I'm Jesus!" Richard. Don't assume that just
because I like Manowar more than Boyzone that I'm speaking from a position
of ignorance.

>>Also with all due respect - bollocks yerself! Current pop music may not be
"cool" or "deep" or very meaningful (was it ever?) but dismissing it out of
hand like that is ridiculous.

Oh bloody Nora.....listen carefully.....I'm not saying that boy bands (etc)
are crap because they're not "cool" (JEEEEZUS!!!!!) or "deep" and I'm fully
aware that some of the best pop music is as shallow as a pool of piss. I am
"dismissing" it because  there is nothing interesting about bad cover
versions and completely unmemorable disco-pop-by-numbers. If we're talking
about music then boy bands barely deserve a mention, because the music is
not the point of the exercise. Without TV, promo videos, boyish good looks
and the media machine these "bands" would die on their perfectly formed
arses. It doesn't matter whether they can dance a bit, sing a bit or even
juggle fucking bowling balls, they have no creative input, no musical
ability and zero personality. It's not ridiculous to dismiss these bands as
irrelevant to the music scene when the music is almost an afterthought.

>>I am a big advocate of live music performance,
and these big pop bands also mount big expensive tours which provide lots of
work for lots of people and provide a bit of glamour and spectacle in
people's hundrum lives.

Ah, bless the little people with their "hundrum" lives. Aren't they lucky to
have such generous and gifted pop stars to entertain them? If you want
glamour and spectacle, try blowing up a fashion show. That's what I call

...and then you waffle on about manufactured pop music. Very nice. We were
talking about something specific, so you can mention the rather splendid
Monkees as often as you want, it won't miraculously become relevant.

>>What IS the problem with pop? It's just one facet of the industry.

Nothing, and yes, I agree. Do I actually need to be here at all? I think
I'll go and have a fag.....

>> Not
liking it is, of course, your right, but you can't just toss it aside
because it doesn't meet your high-falutin' criteria for what is or isn't
cool or important.

Oh please! Stop putting words into my mouth! That's so weak I can't quite
believe it. Cool? Important? What???? Read my post again, this time with
your brain open.

>>>Just don't spend too much time bemoaning the existence of the >kiddie-pop
>>Erm ... wasn't that what you've just done, at some length?


My, that was a long one. Matron.

Dom "all brooms are great" Lawson.


End of Chalkhills Digest #6-15

Go back to the previous page.